Porsche 992的問題，透過圖書和論文來找解法和答案更準確安心。 我們找到下列各種有用的問答集和懶人包

The Complete Book of Porsche 911: Every Model Since 1964

為了解決Porsche 992的問題，作者Leffingwell, Randy 這樣論述：

Porsche's fabled 911 represents the ultimate expression of Ferdinand Porsche's original vision of the perfect sports car. In The Complete Book of Porsche 911, author and photographer Randy Leffingwell provides a year-by-year overview of Stuttgart's most famous car, from the original 901 prototype to

today's technologically advanced GT2 and GT3 derivatives and the latest 992-generation 911. Along the way, he highlights the racing, prototype, and limited-production cars--offering the most complete reference available to these top-tier sports cars.In this book, you'll find the air-cooled cars of

1963 to 1998, then the water-cooled 911s of 1998 to present day. With behind-the-scenes info on the evolution of this iconic sports car, this book offers the detail craved by Porsche enthusiasts. Illustrated throughout with images from Porsche's own historical archive and complemented by the author'

s stunning photos, along with detailed technical specification tables, The Complete Book of Porsche 911 offers a thorough account of one of the most beloved enthusiast cars ever produced. Randy Leffingwell wrote his first book, American Muscle, in 1989 while still on staff at the Los Angeles Times

. Since then, he has authored another 47 titles for Motorbooks and its sister publisher Voyageur Press, including Porsche 911: 50 Years, Corvette: 60 Years, and Harley-Davidson: Myth and Mystique. He lives in southern California, about 100 miles north of Los Angeles.

Porsche 992進入發燒排行的影片

專利維修免責條款之探討

為了解決Porsche 992的問題，作者戴亦涵 這樣論述：

複合式產品隨著使用時間的推移導致耗損或損壞。通常消費者不會購買新產品而是傾向修復它，因為更換零組備件對消費者而言更加經濟實惠，加上購買全新耐久性產品的花費遠高於維修成本，例如汽車。存有潛在龐大經濟利益的售後市場，成為原廠得以透過售出維修零組件來回收研發成本，同時引來其他副廠參與售後市場競爭。複合式產品係以多樣零組件相互組合安裝而成，消費者在初級市場購買原廠產品後，因為必然匹配的零組件設計，導致後續維修時必須選擇與原始設計完全相同，也就是原廠設計的零組件，才能恢復產品之原始整體外觀。為避免副廠未經授權而直接複製原廠的設計，原廠採取智慧財產權手段，尤以設計權或設計專利制度來保護設計。然而，必然匹

配零件的設計保護似乎過度地延伸至售後市場，有主張應以維修免責條款加以限制設計權的行使，零組件設計保護因而在歐盟及美國引發爭議並展開數十年的激論，而維修免責條款的討論主要集中於汽車零組件產業。副廠希望透過維修免責條款開放零組件的售後市場競爭，但原廠認為維修免責條款將扼殺創新的動力。戴姆勒訴帝寶侵害車燈案的判決結果，激發國內針對必然匹配零件的立法討論。本研究以汽車維修零組件之設計保護為主軸，探討歐盟及美國的工業設計及外觀設計制度的發展，同時研究歐美汽車零組件相關之法律爭議案件、維修免責條款及其相關法案，觀察各國近期的立法動向。另外闡述我國設計專利制度，探討我國汽車零組件之產業情形、著名案例及其延伸

影響。接著進行外國法與我國之比較，並綜整各國維修免責條款的立法模式。最後提供我國立法者維修免責條款修訂方向，及未通過維修免責立法時我國副廠業者之因應作為，共兩個面向之建議以供未來發展的參考。