Make clarification的問題，透過圖書和論文來找解法和答案更準確安心。 我們找到下列各種有用的問答集和懶人包

Adlerian Counseling Theory and Practice: (Including Material from Rudolf Dreikurs, MD-Child Psychiatrist-Essentially in His Own

為了解決Make clarification的問題，作者Camp, Facapp William 這樣論述：

The Adlerian approach to counseling is a highly structured approach. Adlerians operate according to a set of principles and procedures that make this form of counseling different from many other forms of counseling. In most other forms, a counselor sees a client and they talk, and they talk, and the

y talk. Adlerians try not to waste a moment. Every word said and everything done is designed according to plan. In the pages of this book, the writer will present techniques that have been used successfully, with the suggestion that the reader, too, may find real success in their use.Chapter 1 and 2

consists of Adlerian child psychology concepts and ideas with information drawn from lectures, interviews, writings, and conversations with Rudolf Dreikurs, MD, as well as ideas from other Adlerian authors, compiled, summarized, edited, updated, annotated, and supplemented for the twenty-first cent

ury.Chapters 3 and 4 are essentially the words of Dr. Dreikurs, compiled and edited from tapes, excerpts from his public conversations, lectures, and radio and television presentations--all organized and presented with his suggestions for their organization and presentation.Much of this material is

presented primarily as a casebook, with explanations included and transcripts of cases conducted by Dr. Dreikurs. It is presented with his permission and appropriate confidentiality, including name changes, etc. Interspersed are comments, observations, and brief explanations presented for clarificat

ion.

Make clarification進入發燒排行的影片

以注意力網絡系統探討憂鬱情緒狀態對高強暴迷思與兒童性偏好者性偏好之影響

為了解決Make clarification的問題，作者陳欣語 這樣論述：

負向情緒狀態為性侵行為人（sexual offender）犯罪之重要前置風險因子（Finkelhor, 1984; Marshall & Barbaree, 1990; Ward & Beech, 2006），可能使性侵行為人的自我調節失功能導致失去抑制或利用性作為情緒調節手段（Ward & Hudson, 1998; Ward et al., 1998）。研究顯示成人性侵行為人在負向情緒狀態有性幻想增加的趨勢，而兒童性侵行為人在憂鬱狀態下更傾向性幻想兒童，表現偏差性偏好（Looman, 1995; Proulx et al., 1996）。然此領域之情緒操弄性研究甚少，目前性侵行為人於情緒

狀態下之性偏好變化尚未釐清。本研究旨在探討成人與兒童性侵行為人在憂鬱情緒狀態下性偏好的注意力表現，以高、低強暴迷思與高、低兒童性偏好之社區民眾為研究樣本，採Posner等人（Petersen & Posner, 2012; Posner & Petersen, 1990）注意力網絡理論中的警覺性網絡（alerting network）、導向性網絡（orienting network）與執行網絡（executive network）為測量指標。本研究隨機分派一半參與者至憂鬱情緒操弄作業與中性情緒操弄作業，以聆聽音樂與自傳式回憶誘發情緒，並於情緒操弄前後透過情緒注意力網絡作業（emotional

attention network test, e-ANT）測量個體對風景、成年女性、及女童圖片之反應時間，計算對不同圖片之注意力網絡指標。本研究共招募126名無刑事前科之男性社區民眾，排除六名e-ANT作答正確率過低之參與者，最終共120名納入分析，平均年齡為27.41歲（標準差為7.61歲），將參與者以強暴迷思接受性量表區分為社區控制組61人、高強暴迷思組59人，並另外將同一群參與者以兒童性偏好量表區分為性偏好低分組62人、性偏好高分組58人分別進行分析。研究結果發現，（1）相對性偏好低分組，性偏好高分組較難從女童圖片抽離注意力至成人圖片；（2）當個體之兒童性偏好分數越高時，其在後測會越快

從成人圖片抽離投注至風景或女童圖片；（3）當緊張與孤單情緒改善時，性偏好高分組對成人刺激之警覺度有所增加；（4）性偏好高分組在生氣程度高時，其對女童之警覺性注意力會優於成人，生氣程度低時則相反。然而，本研究在強暴迷思分組上並未觀察到符合假設之注意力網絡表現。綜合上述，本研究發現以Posner注意力網絡系統之觀點，可觀察到兒童性偏好者對兒童刺激之注意力偏誤，且偏差性偏好之變化與負向情緒狀態有所關聯，支持情緒作為性侵害風險評估與治療之重要角色。

The Reasonability of Marriage in a Changing World

為了解決Make clarification的問題，作者Ruffin, Anderson 這樣論述：

The unbelievers have compromised God's word on covenant marriage, and it has become unethical. The gates of hell will never prevail against covenant marriage. Peter's confession of Christ reveals, "And Jesus answered and said unto him, "Blessed art thou, Simon Barjona: for flesh and blood hath not r

evealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven. And I say also unto thee, that thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth s

hall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven" (Matt. 16:17-19). The gates of hell will never prevail against the Church and covenant marriage. Satan is attacking the sanity of covenant marriage more than any other institution in society. Satan is trying

to get us to toss out God's plan for marriage, from the beginning, and incorporates man's desirable appetite for engineering new truthful absolutes. Satan has kidnapped humanity in principle and is holding us hostage. God's final answer to this saga will be judgment and destruction like in the days

of Noah. Jesus came down to a devilish world to die for the sins of humanity and to restore God's moral foundation to avoid such a catastrophe. Humanity must become yet again ethical, consecrated, sanctified, and holy. We must get God's plan of covenant marriage back in control and restored to its

place of prominence. Fake president, fake lawyers, fake news, counterfeit churches, and phony marriages shall pass away. "Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away" (Matt. 24:35). God's plan for marriage will never pass away.Many are questioning, how do you know Bible princi

ples on marriage are true? Did marriage come from God? If so, why did He create it? How do you know that God exists? Why can't I have my view of marriage? The Bible is an account of God's historical truths concerning the meaning of marriage. Nowhere does it support same-sex marriage to animals, and

things like cars. God's plan for marriage is between a male and a female. God is the author of marriage established in Genesis. "The LORD God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he slept: and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof; and the rib, which the LORD God had

taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man. Adam said, this is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called woman, because she was taken out of man. Therefore, shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one f

lesh. And they were both naked, the man and his wife, and were not ashamed" (Gen. 2:21-25). The Bible contains God's clarification of covenant marriage when we have strayed away from the normal. Same-sex marriage is just the words of men but not the word of God.Marriage has changed in many ways and

shifted toward a worldly interpretation and has lost its spiritual values, and it's like sugar that has lost its sweetness, and like music without good-sounding harmony. It is vital that the institution of marriage reestablish its claim on God's authoritative approach. The same bees no longer make t

he honey. Dr. Anderson Henry Ruffin grew up in Lisman, Alabama and learned to pick cotton and pull corn from the stalks as a child. Determining to find a way out. Dr. Ruffin attended Alabama State University graduating with a bachelor and master’s degree in music education. He earned a Doctor of M

inistry from Virginia University of Lynchburg, Virginia. Dr. Ruffin taught in public schools forty-four years as a band director. Within the last decade, the world has shifted dramatically in the economy, the political landscape, in our personal view of covenant marriage. Each generation needs to be

informed, whether it’s the aging Baby Boomers or the young Millennials, approaches marriage with a different set of questions. We need to be wise. We cannot know the message of the Bible for today until we know its meaning.

情緒對外交決策之影響：以韓戰期間的中共與美國為例

為了解決Make clarification的問題，作者盧俊昇 這樣論述：

近年來隨著腦神經科學的進步，情緒與理性的二分法觀點已受到挑戰與修正。情緒與理性是不可截然兩分的整體機制，這樣的觀點已然衝擊各個研究領域，帶來一波新的「行為革命」浪潮，當然也為國際關係研究帶來了一波「情感轉向」或「情緒轉向」。從2000年開始，陸陸續續有國際關係學者開始倡議重視情感和情緒的研究，基於這樣一個重要觀念轉折的契機，本文嘗試以這波國際關係「情緒轉向」的研究成果，來探討情緒在韓戰的決策過程中扮演一個怎樣的角色。主流國際關係對於戰爭的分析，多半是建立在理性計算的現實主義視角上。理性選擇理論熱衷於把理性和自利的假設，廣泛運用於政治行為的研究中；但個體不可能全盤掌握到最佳可行決策中所需的全部

資訊，顯然人們不是完全的理性，自然也就無法達到經濟學中「效用最大化」的這一目標。換句話說，人是會犯錯的，會受到各種內在與外部因素的影響，進而做出各種不理性的決策，所以情緒也可能是影響決策者的重要因素之一。本論文採質化研究，以論述分析與個案研究做為主要核心研究方法，並透過Todd H. Hall的三種情緒性論述分析(情緒性陳述論述、情緒性挑釁論述與情緒性論述)，來分析韓戰期間美國與中共在決策過程中，是否受到情緒影響而做出不理性的決策。最後本文研究發現，無論是威權國家或是民主國家，其國內政治的激情往往會導致決策者上喪失在實際戰場上的理性判斷。從韓戰中美雙方的分析中可以發現，國家決策者與戰場指揮官的

判斷往往不一致：不論是美軍或是共軍的最終決策者，最終均決定聽從政治的激情而非戰場實際的情況。此可彰顯本文的論點：政治激情往往會凌駕於理性決策之上，進而做出不理性的決策。