Criminal的問題，透過圖書和論文來找解法和答案更準確安心。 我們找到下列各種有用的問答集和懶人包

Disorderly Borders: How International Law Shapes Irregular Migration

為了解決Criminal的問題，作者Thomas, Chantal 這樣論述：

Immigration crises faced by the United States today show the interplay between areas of global law and policy that might at first glance seem quite disparate--economic law, human rights and refugee law, and criminal law relating to the trafficking and smuggling of migrants. This book is largely dedi

cated to unpacking those dynamics and ultimately argues that reform efforts must be expanded. Using as a central case study how international law relates to the irregular labor migration of undocumented migrant farm workers in upstate New York, this book examines the conditions for entry of these wo

rkers, for their residence and work while in the US, and finally what happens if they are apprehended and subject to expulsion. The author aims to show that the presence of these migrants can be significantly attributed to dynamics flowing from international economic law, and that the interaction of

international economic law with international human rights, refugee, labor and criminal law in defining their legal rights and remedies is often incoherent. As such, this wave of irregular migration might be seen as the product of a "perfect storm" in international law: a vexed and unstable relatio

nship between disparate regimes that propels dynamic population movements without just and orderly means of protection. Chantal Thomas is Professor of Law at Cornell Law School, where she also directs the Clarke Initiative for Law and Development in the Middle East and North Africa.

Criminal進入發燒排行的影片

人工智慧之刑法相關議題研究

為了解決Criminal的問題，作者邱云莉 這樣論述：

「人工智慧」係指擁有類似人類智慧的電腦程式，透過電腦的發明、網際網路的盛行、人類神經細胞的分析與仿造等，人類的智慧得以在機器上重現且漸趨完整。尤其在大數據及深度學習出現後，再次將人工智慧發展推向另一波高潮，惟在新技術問世後，許多問題即陸續接踵而來。而人工智慧與其他新科技技術不同的是其擁有如同人類智慧般的思考模式，甚至連程式設計者本身皆無法完全了解其演算過程。也因為人工智慧的難預測性、不透明性等問題，對於傳統刑法體系將可能造成衝擊，例如人工智慧是否具有法律人格的問題，以及發生損害結果時應如何劃分責任歸屬的爭議。 本文主要透過文獻分析、比較研究及綜合歸納的方法進行研究。首先針對人工智慧是否

具有法律人格的問題進行釐清，本文認為基於人工智慧技術目前的發展狀況，應採取否定說，唯有未來真出現完全不受人類程式編列限制、可依自主意識行為的強人工智慧時，才應例外採取區分說。 接著本文將分別介紹人工智慧的三大應用領域－自動駕駛、司法系統及醫療系統。除了介紹人工智慧在各領域應用的基礎外，也將分別提出人工智慧將帶來的影響，以及發生刑法爭議時責任歸屬的劃分。尤其是當人類與人工智慧共同造成損害結果時，刑事責任應如何歸責即成為重點。本文將分析現有的學說文獻及相關見解，並提出個人見解，希望可藉此提供解決之道。而目前人工智慧仍處於剛開始發展的狀態，為了促進人工智慧的發展，政府應建立良好的實驗場域供民間

投入研究。此外，目前我國關於人工智慧法律規範尚未完備，若未來發生有關人工智慧的法律爭議，將可能會是相當棘手的問題，因此促進相關法規的訂定係為我國應持續努力的目標。

Railway Accidents and Incidents in South-East England

為了解決Criminal的問題，作者D’Enno, Douglas 這樣論述：

This unique volume is a startling record of memorable, sometimes tragic, happenings culled from the railway history of three counties in south-east England: Sussex, Surrey and Kent. Among the extraordinary incidents in West Sussex was the damage to Bognor station by gale force winds in 1897, foll

owed just two years later by a disastrous fire caused by a porter drying his coat on a stove. At Cocking, in 1951, a locomotive plunged into a gully, resulting in the end of goods services from Chichester to Midhurst. In neighbouring Surrey, a drunken driver smashed into the wooden booking office at

Tattenham Corner in 1993. Bramley and New Malden stations were subjected to direct enemy aircraft fire in the Second World War. Tales of murders include the unsolved 1905 case of Mary Sophia Money, thrown to her death from a moving train in Merstham Tunnel, Surrey. In Kent, an employee at Dover Pri

ory Station, Thomas Wells, shot dead his intolerable boss, Edward Walsh, on 1 May 1868. He received the death sentence - and was the first criminal in the country to be hanged privately behind prison walls. With a wealth of terrific images, Douglas d’Enno explores these fascinating, often disastrous

, moments in railway history.

死刑以外，生刑之極－終身刑之研究

為了解決Criminal的問題，作者呂欣恬 這樣論述：

隨著世界上越來越多國家相繼廢除死刑，終身刑(Life Sentences，或稱Life Imprisonment)成為死刑以外最為嚴厲之刑罰，在國際上亦被廣泛使用。過往，我國對於終身刑之討論大多聚焦於是否以此作為死刑之替代刑，然而終身刑之本質，及其適用與影響卻甚少被重視。有鑑於此，本文擬以終身刑為研究重點，就其源起、定義、類型，以及比較法上適用概況為介紹，並就我國是否要增訂無假釋終身刑，以及現行無期徒刑有關規定可能致生之問題為討論。