Civic meaning的問題，透過圖書和論文來找解法和答案更準確安心。 我們找到下列各種有用的問答集和懶人包

Jacques Maritain and Human Rights: Totalitarianism, Anti-Semitism and Democracy (1936-1951)

為了解決Civic meaning的問題，作者Lorenzini, Daniele 這樣論述：

The influence of Jacques Maritain in the post-war era's embrace of human rights is undeniable. Scholars, however, overlook a major shift in his use of language. Daniele Lorenzini argues the turn from Maritain's use of the expression "rights of the person" to "the rights of man" is packed with meanin

g. Reconstructing the historical context in which this shift occurred is key to fully grasping what Maritain accomplished. It is also essential if one seeks to defend Maritain against accusation that he enacted a victory of the American and French modern revolutionary spirit over ecclesiastical teac

hing when he legitimized "the rights of man." The notion that Maritain may have taken up the cause of the civic-secular citizen when these secularly articulated rights were consciously never embraced by Catholic magisterium (that instead promulgated the rights of the person) merits serious attention

. Lorenzini reconstructs Maritain's historical context and theoretical trajectory shaped by particular circumstances--most evidently World War II, but also his time in the United States and his work with the Committee of Catholics for Human Rights. Lorenzini is not suggesting that Maritain staged a

siege of Catholic thought, but that he did in fact lay the foundations for turning the conversation away from the tenets upheld by ecclesiastical authority on the concept of rights toward an articulation that more pointedly connects such rights to the actual possession and protection. How and why t

his happens, Lorenzini demonstrates, is "grasped only if critically situated in the union of history of history and biography that makes this possible and encourages it, as does Maritain's residency in the United States--an exile that obliged the French philosopher to render a deep seated account of

the unbelievable (and tragic) political and intellectual panorama." In short, Maritain set in motion the innovative redefinition of the elements that would soon be known as the human rights. But to Maritain these elements were always proper to the new ideal of the "vitally Christian" political city

, the city "founded essentially on the two 'pillars' of democracy and the safeguarding of the rights of man." What originally began as a purely linguistic investigation of Maritain's use of terminology has led Lorenzini to ask whether Maritain himself was won over from the act of conversing of right

s associated with personhood to the real-time struggle for these rights, an evolution not just of Maritain's language but of the man himself. Lorenzini's work is a formidable contribution to the literature pertaining to the period of post-war thought and Maritain on human rights. In his labors to c

arefully digest the full span of Maritain's intellectual trajectory on rights, Lorenzini brings Jacques Maritain alive both as a man of vision but also fervent action, and defends him from critics and historians that accuse him of spurning Church teaching and papal authority. As Lorenzini's study sh

ows, the human rights of the secular-civic world--whose lineage scholars attribute in large part to Maritain--were always derived from Catholic teaching and intended for use in constructing the truly Christian city. This work stands out in a vast repertoire of work on the subject of Jacques Maritai

n, and accomplishes both high level philosophical and historical sleuthing. It is of particular interest to American readers who may not fully realize the depth of Maritain's maturation of thought during his residency in the United States. This is an astounding read for historians, scholars of polit

ical philosophy, and students of Jacques Maritain. Daniele Lorenzini is Assistant Professor of Philosophy at the University of Warwick, where he is also Deputy Director of the Centre for Research in Post-Kantian European Philosophy. He is the author of Éthique et politique de soi (Vrin, 2015) and

La force du vrai (Le bord de l’eau, 2017), as well as the editor of Foucault and the Making of Subjects (Rowman & Littlefield, 2016).

Women’’s Lives, Women’’s Voices: Roman Material Culture and Female Agency in the Bay of Naples

為了解決Civic meaning的問題，作者 這樣論述：

Brenda Longfellow is an associate professor of art history at the University of Iowa. She is the author of Roman Imperialism and Civic Patronage: Form, Meaning, and Ideology in Monumental Fountain Complexes.Molly Swetnam-Burland is an associate professor of classical studies at the College of Willia

m and Mary. She is the author of Egypt in Italy: Visions of Egypt in Roman Imperial Culture.

實況斗內（Donate）：以心理所有權、擬社會人際互動與感知互動性探索網路直播觀眾之消費行為

為了解決Civic meaning的問題，作者陳建瑋 這樣論述：

近年來隨著通訊技術的普及與發展，網路直播作為一種新型媒體娛樂互動形式，在全球範圍內發展迅猛，衍伸了許多商業模式，其中贊助(Donate)所帶來的經濟效益尤其龐大，在這裡指的是觀眾透過購買直播平台虛擬點數、禮物贈送給主播的行為，而先前關於贊助的研究多旨在解釋慈善捐贈，較少針對觀看者在直播中所感知到的心理體驗來對消費行為的相關研究。目前對於觀看者在頻道中的消費動機仍然所知有限，本研究根據以心理所有權、擬社會人際互動與感知互動性等理論來探討觀看者的消費行為。本研究主要探討於直播環境中，觀眾在頻道中所產生的心理所有權以及擬社會人際互動是否影響消費意圖，其次本研究探討感知互動性與自我投資等因素是否會使

觀眾產生心理所有權以及擬社會人際互動進而影響消費意圖。研究針對曾接觸過實況的觀眾進行線上問卷發放，並經由問卷設計請受測者填答問卷前，帶入自己最喜歡以及最常觀看甚至消費過的直播頻道以確保準確性，問卷於社群論壇平台(巴哈姆特、Dcard)進行發放，總共回收400份有效問卷，使用 SmartPLS3.0 程式進行信效度分析與路徑分析。經過研究結果發現：（1）心理所有權與擬社會人際互動皆對消費意圖有較為顯著的影響，而擬社會人際互動的影響較大。推測由於直播環境會使大部分觀眾對主播及其他觀看者產生片面情感，進而覺得正在跟”真正”的朋友交流，這種感覺對於消費意圖之影響甚至大過對頻道的擁有感。（2）直播環境下

觀眾的感知互動性，其中感知交流性、感知響應性對於擬社會人際互動都有顯著的影響，但皆對於心理所有權無顯著影響。（3）感知互動性中的感知可控性對於心理所有權有顯著影響，但對於擬社會人際互動無顯著影響。（4）自我投資對於心理所有權與擬社會人際互動皆產生非常顯著的影響。