Aimer YouTube的問題，透過圖書和論文來找解法和答案更準確安心。 我們找到下列各種有用的問答集和懶人包

當身為「可貶者」變成一種優勢：文本中的精神疾病之譬喻形象與其修辭功能

為了解決Aimer YouTube的問題，作者施鈺珺 這樣論述：

Mental illnesses often inspire artists and writers and are omnipresent in various works, yet the moral adequacy of portraying their images remained controversial: Goffman (2010) had described the challenges the “discreditables” might have faced and the privileges they might get once being uncovered

in his essay. However, Susan Sontag believed that wrapping disease in metaphors discouraged, silenced, and shamed patients in her Illness as Metaphor. Intriguingly, other social studies have proven that the audiences’ orientation in interpersonal distances, cultural values, the symptoms, and even t

he lexical choices will all be the determinants that vary the image and the signified of the mental health label (Wong et al.; Perry). This research aims to center the discussion on what the diseases and the patients will represent and the privileges be demonstrated in these texts from a rhetorical

aspect? Hence, is the medical metaphor necessary? Further, what may be the function of different symptoms? By applying principally the theories of uncanny, abjection, and stigma, this research has built a theory on presuming Meursault in Camus’s The Stranger has Asperger, then analyze the audiences’

fear and power of stigma in two recent works: the episode “ADHD Is Necessary” in Taiwanese TV drama: On Children, and a French novel: Nothing Holds Back the Night. The results showed that the mental illness can be an advantageous metaphor, just as an endowing “Mark of Cain”, threatening yet defensi

ve. The presence of the label seems to be necessary since it could clandestinely convey some clues of the unnamable, taboo, or unconsciously-existed private standpoint, and even allow it to be staged in a verbal form. Meanwhile, this research suggests that the mental illnesses as metaphors can be a

rhetorical trigger, launching another kind of codified discourses.